British Theatre
REVIEW: Henry IV Part One, RSC ✭✭✭
HomeNews & ReviewsREVIEW: Henry IV Part One, RSC ✭✭✭
27 April 2014 · 5 min read · 1,061 words

REVIEW: Henry IV Part One, RSC ✭✭✭

Perhaps it was just that Richard II promised so much, but this Henry IV Part One did not make one long for Part Two.

Barbican CentreGregory DoranHenry IV Part OneRegionalReviewsRoyal Shakespeare Company

Joshua Richards, Antony Sher and Youssef Kerkour in Henry lV Parts l and ll. Photograph: Tristram Kenton Henry IV Part One

Royal Shakespeare Company, Stratford Upon Avon, shortly to transfer to the Barbican.

26 April 2014

3 Stars

When the conclusion you draw about a production of Henry IV Part One is that the finest, most assured and most memorable performance is that given by the actor playing the part of Ned Poins, you know, to mis-quote the Bard, that something is rotten in Bolingbroke's court and the taverns of Eastcheap.

Yet, there it is. In the Gregory Doran directed revival of Henry IV Part One, now playing at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre and later to transfer to London for a season at the Barbican, it is Sam Marks's tremendously likeable, intelligently played Poins who triumphs. And Poins does not appear in the second Act.

This production is a follow-up to the David Tennant Richard II of last season and continues the story of the throne of England from where that play ended. The opening sequences here readily evoke the sense of that wonderful production: a spare cathedral-like space, the Crown front and centre, holy music and a feeling of troubled expectancy. There is even, briefly, a ghostly image of the Tennant Richard, as King Henry ponders his situation.

But there is, pretty much, where the similarities end.

At least in terms of the work of the Company. The set from Stephen Brimson Lewis is quite lovely, particularly the pastoral effect created for some of the Falstaff scenes. And Tim Mitchell's lighting is truly excellent, adding depth and perspective, and true style, to many of the scenes.

The play depends upon four key performances: Falstaff, Hal, Hotspur and Henry. Here, none of those performances come close to the level attained by many of the performers in Richard II; it is not that they are all bad, but none of them are memorable, insightful, arresting or revelatory.

For the stage of the Royal Shakespeare Company, the standard here is not really acceptable. Yes, it is not anything like as bad as the worst productions in the Michael Boyd era, but it certainly is the most pedestrian work that Doran has delivered in the last seven years. RSC Productions should be better than Shakespeare anywhere else in the world. This production is not in that league.

Anthony Sher is the chief difficulty. Falstaff is one of Shakespeare's great comic characters, a rogue of tenacious self-serving guile, with a ready tongue, a slavering thirst for alcohol and a capacity to spin a tall tale beyond the skill of ordinary mortals. He almost defines the notion of "loveable rogue".

So the key attributes sought from an actor are: hilarity and affection. The audience must laugh at and with Falstaff, but care about him. Unless that happens, the character's eventual fate (at the hands of Hal) will not be poignant and affecting as Shakespeare intended.

Sher is not funny and he fails to incite any sympathy from the audience. It's a dull, lugubrious performance, stuffed full with slow over-articulation and selfish solo turns. He never seems to be in a scene with anyone else and, especially, there is no sense of a true bond between he and Hal.

His costume and wig do not help proceedings. He looks like he has strayed from the set of The Hobbit, rather than like a real flesh and blood person. Wide eyed mugging can only go so far - Sher tries to utilise it to fuel his entire performance, with the result it falls flat around him.

There is nothing fresh or imaginative about Sher's performance. Rather, it has the feel of a comic turn from Gilbert and Sullivan, where the actor is doing "the business" laid out in Martyn Green's notes without really understanding it or finding the truth in the performance of the business himself.

The result is plodding, mildly amusing - but chiefly dull.

Equally dull, quite surprisingly for such a good, reliable actor, is Jasper Britten's Henry. By the time this play starts, Henry has been on the throne for a long time, time enough for his conscience to be vexed by his part in his predecessor's deposing and demise. He is a weary, troubled monarch, cursed with a prodigal heir and a discontented nobility.

Britten does not get to grips with the multi-faceted complexity of the character. This Henry seems angry and preoccupied rather than intense and complicated. He is hampered by an appalling hair cut which does much to rob him of credibility (he seems to be growing his hair to the correct length, a task that ought to have been completed well before the first preview) and his mastery of the language is not as confident and assured as it ought to be. There is no sense of his greatness as a King.

Hal is a great part, but it requires a quicksilver sensibility from the actor, an impressive easy charisma, an infectious leaning to mischief and tons of style. Alex Hassall does not gleam as Hal should glean. Certainly, it is difficult to understand why Marks was not Hal and Hassall, Hotspur. The difference in dynamism is profound.

Hassall's costumes don't help him either, although when he eventually assumes armour his performance lifts markedly. However, he does not really find either the heroic aspect to Hal or the hedonistic wastrel inherent in being Falstaff's apprentice.

With Trevor White's Hotspur, the problem is different. He gives a highly charged performance but it is unfocussed, sprawling. Given the low-key work done by the other leads, White is a bit like a Jack-in-the-Box on a shelf full of Scrabble sets: he stands out but it is not quite clear why he is there, nor how what he does works with the others.

White is at his best in his scenes with Jennifer Kirby's Lady Percy. In those scenes, his over-the-top attack is blunted and there is clear purpose to his choices. Kirby is poised and at ease with the language and she makes the most of the role.

Perhaps it was just that Richard II promised so much, but this Henry IV Part One did not make one long for Part Two.

Book tickets for Henry IV Part One at the Barbican Theatre Book tickets for Henry IV Part Two at the Barbican Theatre

S
Stephen Collins

Stephen Collins is a contributor at British Theatre, covering West End productions, London theatre news, casting updates, and UK stage trends.

Stay in the spotlight

Get the latest theatre news, reviews and exclusive offers straight to your inbox.

Shows mentioned

More from Stephen Collins

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Station Master, Tristan Bates Theatre ✭✭✭

Connor's score owes a considerable debt to Sondheim, but, that said, it treads in very interesting paths. Complex and intricate, the melodies and harmonies reward careful listening, but there is no danger of a "hummable tune" for the most part, even though individual numbers and vocal lines are quite beguiling, instantly enjoyable.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Waste, National Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Barker's play is extraordinary, especially given that it was written over a century ago and revised by him in the late 20’s, the original having been banned from performance. The notions and complex philosophies which underline the narrative are as fresh, vital and important now as then. The need to invest in the future, to educate the young properly. The hopelessness of political cabals. The marginalisation of women. Double-standards in public life. The dirty compromises of party politics. The terror a true rebel with a proper cause can create in the complacent and borne to rule.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: All On Her Own - Harlequinade, Garrick Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: All On Her Own - Harlequinade, Garrick Theatre ✭✭✭✭✭

The revival of Harlequinade, directed by Branagh and Ashford, now playing at the Garrick Theatre (in a 100 minute experience that includes All On Her Own and no intervals) is something of a revelation. Mostly, Harlequinade is seen in conjunction with The Browning Version, one of Rattigan’s masterpieces, usually as a curtain raiser. To my mind, that combination has never worked and Harlequinade has always seemed pale and irksome by comparison with The Browning Version. But, here, released from the curtain raiser position, placed directly in the spotlight, splendidly set up by the intense darkness of All On Her Own, the play can shine.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

Related articles

REVIEW: Death Of A Salesman, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Death Of A Salesman, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭

The role of Willy Loman is very exacting, requiring great range and subtlety from the actor. The single greatest requirement, though, is for the actor to be Loman rather than to play him; there needs to be total immersion in the character, and the character's different stages. It must be possible to see the Loman who so enthralled and impressed his sons, the Loman who believed in the Dream and to contrast that against the Loman who is engulfed, diminished, destroyed. Antony Sher gives a prickly, vigorous, erratically explosive performance. He might wear Loman’s skin but he never gets under it.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Shoemaker's Holiday, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Shoemaker's Holiday, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Breen squeezes every bit of comedic possibility from the play. The repertory company, so good in the dramatic and enthralling Oppenheimer, prove to be equally skilled in the bawdy comedy department. There are sly asides, vicious insults, dirty double entendres, rowdy gags, silly accent routines, fart jokes, catch-phrase jollity, physical comedy, costume comedy, sight gags, clowning - you name it, it can be found in Breen's lucid, fast-moving and hugely enjoyable production.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: The Witch Of Edmonton, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: The Witch Of Edmonton, Swan Theatre ✭✭✭✭

A beautiful, sometimes shocking, sometimes haunting, production of an intricate and detailed dissection of human frailty and weakness. Doran lavishes great care and attention on the task of illuminating the text, telling the story in an engrossing way. Niki Turner's spare, but stunningly effective design, aids immeasurably.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Love's Sacrifice, The Swan Theatre ✭✭

News

REVIEW: Love's Sacrifice, The Swan Theatre ✭✭

Despite a delicious design from Anna Fleischle (the black velvet floor and beautifully detailed costumes especially) and some winning, often charming, performances from Catrin Stewart, Jamie Thomas King, Andy Apollo, Colin Ryan and Matthew Needham, Dunster’s production does not establish any case for Love’s Sacrifice to be revived.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

REVIEW: Love's Labour's Won, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭✭

News

REVIEW: Love's Labour's Won, Royal Shakespeare Theatre ✭✭✭✭

Christopher Luscombe's very funny version of the Beatrice/Benedick show complete with magnificent, period set (Simon Highlett), some fabulous costumes, Nigel Hess' delightful music and Jenny Arnold's joyful movement. Setting the play in the post-World War 1 period works nicely; the sense of changing times is entirely appropriate. It's a gentle but frisky time and you can almost hear the approach of the flappers.

S

Stephen Collins

News & Reviews

Type to search...